IN SUPPORT OF HB 1096
Dear Members of the House Judiciary Committee;
My name is Katy Faust. I am the founder and director of the children’s rights organization Them Before Us. We represent the party who is most impacted by HB 1096: the children. Here are four ways commercial surrogacy violates the rights and wellbeing of children.
- Commodification of Children. Commercial surrogacy creates a marketplace of children. Around half of children created through reproductive technologies are disturbed that money changed hands during their conception. These children often feel commodified and purchased. HB 1096 prevents child commodification.
“Being “wanted” can sometimes feel like a curse, like I was created to make you happy, my rights be damned. I’d be lying if I said I never felt commodified.” – Bethany
“I knew from an early age that I was purchased and selected from essentially a catalog. I knew that my blonde hair and blue eyes were somehow valued above other colorations. I always knew that I was purchased and created precisely to make her happy.” – Alana
“I am told, look how much your parents wanted you, they planned and saved to have you… When you know that a huge part of the reason that you came into the world is due solely to a paycheck, and that after being paid you are disposable, given away and never thought of again, it impacts how you view yourself.” –Jessica Kern (Child of Surrogacy)
“I don’t care why my parents or my mother did this. It looks to me like I was bought and sold. You can dress it up with as many pretty words as you want. But the fact is that someone contracted you to make a child, give up your parental rights and hand over your flesh and blood child. When you exchange something for money it is called a commodity. Babies are not commodities. Babies are human beings.” –Brian C (Child of Surrogacy)
- Intentionally Broken Families. Commercial surrogacy arrangements typically involve “donor” eggs and/or sperm, thus intentionally separating a child from their genetic mother or father. Donor children struggle disproportionately with depression, delinquency, and substance abuse. Further, over eighty percent of donor-conceived children desire to know the identity of their biological father and/or mother, regardless of their household structure. HB 1096 protects children from being intentionally denied a relationship with their biological parents.
“I am an egg donor-conceived. Male. I found out when I was 16, now in my mid 20’s. Years later I still wonder and ponder, “who is my REAL Mother”? Where is she? My current Mother, well growing up never accepted me, or even cared to grow a bond with me. It makes sense why now.”
“After the shock of “losing” my dad, I realized that there was a man out there who I did look like who fathered me. I began to mourn the loss of a man I never even knew existed until a few weeks earlier. Who was he? Did he ever think about me?” – Stephanie Blessing
One donor-conceived woman notes, “this is not a new way of making families. It’s a new way of tearing them apart.”
- Motherlessness. Commercial surrogacy intentionally separates children from their birth mother and often their genetic mother. Many surrogate-born children will also be deprived of a mother in their home. Whether they are motherless due to tragedy or intentionality, children without mothers suffer. HB 1096 recognizes that mothers are not optional to children.
“I never had a mom’s love and affection. I still suffer because of that abandonment feeling. I often would wonder why every other kid had a relationship with their mom, but not me. Was I unlovable in the sight of my mom? Why did she not want to be in my life?” – Rhianna
“My formative years were almost entirely devoid of women. I didn’t even know that there was such a thing as a mother until I watched “The Land Before Time” at school. My 5-year-old brain could not understand why I didn’t have the mom that I suddenly desperately wanted. I felt the loss. I felt the hole. As I grew, I tried to fill that hole with aunts, my dads’ lesbian friends and teachers. I remember asking my first grade teacher if I could call her mom. I asked that question of any woman who showed me any amount of love and affection. It was instinctive. I craved a mother’s love even though I was well-loved by my two gay dads” – Samantha
- Mental and Emotional Trauma. In commercial surrogacy, children are always separated from their birth mothers. Studies show that maternal separation causes “major physiological stressor for the infant.” Even brief maternal deprivation can permanently alter the structure of the infant brain. Many adoptees feel they have suffered a “primal wound” from losing their mother on the day of their birth. This trauma hinders lifelong attachment, bonding, and impacts a child’s psychological health.
Despite being adopted by parents who were “loving, educated, church going, hard working people,” Stacy describes the impact that the “primal wound” had on her childhood and development.
I grew up with a deep void which wasn’t identified or addressed until much, much later. I felt darkly disconnected from any type of family. I could never quite shake the unspoken fact that my life began with a relinquishment. [It had been decided that I’d be] abandoned by my biological mother before I was even born. I found her many years later, and she told me that she never even looked at me after she gave birth to me. She didn’t hold me. I was removed from the room like an excised parasite.
Best practice in adoption and foster care first makes every effort to keep the child with her birth parents, and then carefully screens intended parents. Commercial surrogacy inverts those best practices- it intentionally separates children from their birth mother and conducts no vetting of intended parents. Unlike adoption, which functions as an institution to protect children’s needs, commercial surrogacy functions as a market to meet the desires of adults.
Children have a right to their mother and father. Children have a right to be born free, not bought and sold. Commercial surrogacy violates those rights. We strongly urge that all legislators of South Dakota stand united in supporting HB 1096, for the rights of those most vulnerable.
We wholeheartedly agree with the sentiments of this letter. Surrogacy should be banned.
I’m confused. Is this about South Dakota or North Dakota. Is North Dakota trying to BAN commercial surrogacy? If so, isn’t that a good thing?
You talk about suragasy, what about forced adoption through the county, state, government? How many children does each state need to keep getting that federal paycheck? And how many are being adopted out to LGBTQ? What bout the monthly tax free stipends? Please research ! Look into the “HART” family story- of 2 women who adopted 6 children then went over a Calif. seaside cliff, 2016 I believe, or the Az men who fost/adopt 14 children, and “accendently” left a infant in a hot car to die! I believe the HAM FAMILY. These are but a couple- but pls research more! Pls tell us what we must do to change the system!!!! Thank you